Part 1: Reusing History

London 2012 Olympic Complex
(Devyn)

How can a one-time use complex be used to revitalize or expand a city?

-A one-time use complex generally brings new occupants and generates a lot of revenue for the city not only while the complex is being used, but even after it is no longer needed. There is a domino effect that occurs when new residents come into a city; jobs are created to accommodate new growth and then the economy flourishes.

How does a fixed pre-programmed facility effect future growth?

-Fixed pre-programmed facilities create limitations for the building itself and for the surrounding area because it has been proven throughout history that buildings usually never maintain a singular program from their creation to their deterioration or demolition. If a building can be converted to accommodate new functions, the area will benefit greater.

Does the overall layout of, for example the Olympic complex, affect growth in the future?

-All of the complexes created for the London Olympics were designed with future programs in mind. For example, since the complex by Hadid is open to transformation, the growth of the city is not hindered because the pools are being converted to accommodate an aquatic center for more occupants; this boosts revenue and prevents wasted space.

Does materiality affect the surrounding area in a positive or negative way?  Does the use of specific materials limit the design of future growth?

-Depending on the scale, materials can have effects on the surrounding area because they can become monuments or they can assimilate into the existing urban context. I think as long as the materials of the building are structurally stable, the programmatic qualities are not affected negatively.

Can these remnants that are left behind, after the athletes return home, be reused to revitalize a surrounding area regardless of the projects age (other Olympic complexes)?
Would a montage of buildings create a lack of continuity, or celebrate it?

-In the architectural realm today, it is becoming more popular to remodel or refurbish existing structures due to a lack of funds and materials, so it seems beneficial to revitalize any and all Olympic complexes rather than leave them stagnant and barren. Having the Olympics in your city is earned and prized, so I would think a montage of buildings would celebrate the revitalization rather than affect the continuity. The Olympics is somewhat of a spectacle already so the remaining complexes would serve a reminders of the prosperity of the city.